Част 12 · Chapter 236
Текстът на Ари
Преведено с ИИ
Все още не е налично на Български — показва се English
- And behold, since the essence of the Shema is for the nursing of the internality, therefore the third pregnancy of the Mochin of Katnut is included in it, as well as the first pregnancy of the three included in three of the internality. And only the nursing of the internality was mentioned, which is the Mochin of VAK, hinted at in the word 'Echad', as is known. But, indeed, there are three couplings, as above, and all of them are called either the aspect of the third pregnancy of the externality, because it comes first in the intentions of the Shema, as mentioned, or the aspect of Gadlut, the pregnancy of the internality.
Вътрешна светлина
Преведено с ИИ
Все още не е налично на Български — показва се English
Вътрешно съзерцание, въпроси и отговори
Все още не е налично на Български — показва се English
Зареждане на Вътрешно съзерцание…
Този коментар още не е съпоставен с отделните параграфи — точките са показани в реда за четене, а номерът до всяка от тях брои самите бележки, не параграфите от текста на Ари.
Не е съпоставено с параграф
And he explains that although only the drawing of the VAK of Gadlut, which is the nursing of internality, was mentioned in the intention of the Shema of Yotzer, nonetheless the Ibur of internality, which is three within three, is necessarily included as well; and likewise the second Ibur of Katnut, from which the surrounding lights of the Katnut of Aba are drawn, is necessarily included in it. Only he did not trouble to explain them, since they are understood of themselves, for it is impossible to receive anything from an upper degree before all the degrees below it have entered it in their completeness. However, in truth there are here three couplings, which are: the first second Ibur, for the sake of the surrounding lights of Aba; and the third Ibur of the Partzuf NHY of Gadlut, and likewise of the Partzuf HGT of Gadlut. And further on it is likewise printed “the third Ibur of externality,” and there too one must say “the second Ibur.”